Like others, I am disappointed that not even in the 6th version's roadmap there is no plan for batch update and delete. If I need to delete all the rows that have Expired==true in a table I need to do it in one operation not in "n".
New Comment on "Roadmap"
↧
↧
Edited Issue: Scheme update without data loss [389]
If I create data model using EntityFramework I could generate database from model. However, I cannot update existing database schema if I change enity data model.
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
↧
New Comment on "NuGet Packages"
@balajesankar - From the 'Getting and Building the Code' section of the Documentation page:
The easiest way to work with the code base is to install Visual Studio 2012 RC. You can also work with any other IDE provided you have .NET Framework 4.5 and MSBuild on your machine.
↧
Edited Issue: Scheme update without data loss [389]
If I create data model using EntityFramework I could generate database from model. However, I cannot update existing database schema if I change enity data model.
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
↧
Commented Issue: Scheme update without data loss [389]
If I create data model using EntityFramework I could generate database from model. However, I cannot update existing database schema if I change enity data model.
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
Comments: Hey, We support Migrations if you are using Code First, you can see this post for more details - http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2012/02/09/ef-4-3-code-based-migrations-walkthrough.aspx. Enabling Migrations for models built with the EF Designer is already tracked by this issue - http://entityframework.codeplex.com/workitem/89. ~Rowan
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
Comments: Hey, We support Migrations if you are using Code First, you can see this post for more details - http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2012/02/09/ef-4-3-code-based-migrations-walkthrough.aspx. Enabling Migrations for models built with the EF Designer is already tracked by this issue - http://entityframework.codeplex.com/workitem/89. ~Rowan
↧
↧
Edited Issue: Scheme update without data loss [389]
If I create data model using EntityFramework I could generate database from model. However, I cannot update existing database schema if I change enity data model.
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
↧
Commented Issue: Scheme update without data loss [389]
If I create data model using EntityFramework I could generate database from model. However, I cannot update existing database schema if I change enity data model.
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
Comments: I'm marking this issue as fixed since the remaining work is already tracked by another issue.
That would be great if EntityFramework will provide an ability to update existing database by new model without data loss.
Thank you
Comments: I'm marking this issue as fixed since the remaining work is already tracked by another issue.
↧
Edited Issue: Code first: one entity mapping to two tables,when they have different primary key name [388]
I want mapping one entity to two tables, but then two tables have different primary key names.
In code first, how to configure this?
In code first, how to configure this?
↧
Commented Issue: Code first: one entity mapping to two tables,when they have different primary key name [388]
I want mapping one entity to two tables, but then two tables have different primary key names.
In code first, how to configure this?
Comments: Hey, Code First doesn't support this scenario today, we'll leave this item active to track adding support. ~Rowan
In code first, how to configure this?
Comments: Hey, Code First doesn't support this scenario today, we'll leave this item active to track adding support. ~Rowan
↧
↧
New Post: Thanks in advance
Thanks, we are excited about the move too!
↧
New Comment on "Roadmap"
The discussion about batch delete/update has moved to this discussion thread - http://entityframework.codeplex.com/discussions/376901
↧
New Comment on "Roadmap"
@Grauenwolf - You can use private property setters with EF today. We also have this work item to allow you to configure how data is read and written to objects - http://entityframework.codeplex.com/workitem/93. Please add your vote to the feature.
↧
New Post: Query generation in batch insert scenarios
Hey,
This is definitely something we want to add to the product, we've even done some prototyping in the past around this. The relevant feature on the backlog is here - http://entityframework.codeplex.com/workitem/53.
~Rowan
↧
↧
Commented Issue: SQL Server connection strings should not use "MultipleActiveResultSets=true" by default [387]
"MultipleActiveResultsSets=true" (MARS) should not be used by the default connection factories or templates.
MARS adds performance overhead to queries and is not thread-safe prior to .Net 4.5 (which can be confusing if a DbContext is shared between threads or AsParallel is used as no errors are thrown, but data corruption can occur).
Comments: Hey, MARS is required for Lazy Loading to work. We'll take another look at this as a team but I suspect the decision will be to leave it enabled so that Lazy Loading works by default. ~Rowan
MARS adds performance overhead to queries and is not thread-safe prior to .Net 4.5 (which can be confusing if a DbContext is shared between threads or AsParallel is used as no errors are thrown, but data corruption can occur).
Comments: Hey, MARS is required for Lazy Loading to work. We'll take another look at this as a team but I suspect the decision will be to leave it enabled so that Lazy Loading works by default. ~Rowan
↧
Edited Issue: Add the debug symbols for EF to SymbolSource [386]
It would often be useful for us developers to be able to step through the EF code to understand why it does something or why something doen't work. Having the debug symbols distributed with the nuget package would help us.
↧
Commented Issue: Add the debug symbols for EF to SymbolSource [386]
It would often be useful for us developers to be able to step through the EF code to understand why it does something or why something doen't work. Having the debug symbols distributed with the nuget package would help us.
Comments: Hey, Including them in the NuGet package is a good idea, we'll take a look at this for the next release. ~Rowan
Comments: Hey, Including them in the NuGet package is a good idea, we'll take a look at this for the next release. ~Rowan
↧
New Comment on "Roadmap"
Thanks guys. Feel free to create new/vote existing issues where appropriate and also start threads in the Discussions tab.
↧
↧
New Comment on "Roadmap"
Sql's View on CodeFirst.
Please.
↧
New Post: Source code for EF 5
It probably would have been useful to create such a tag but no such tag exists and, as you alluded to, the work has been going on in parallel so it wouldn't have been very easy to do anyway.
Thanks,
Arthur
↧
New Post: How command works
Hi Nicolas,
I'm not very familiar with EUSS so can you provide some more detail on what exactly it is that would be needed for this?
Thanks,
Arthur
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
